9/9/2023 0 Comments Sign language for all done![]() ![]() Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind (FSDB) Staff American Sign Language Program: Procedures ( pdf ) ( doc ).Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind (FSDB) Staff American Sign Language Policy ( pdf ) ( doc ).Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind (FSDB) Total Communication Philosophy ( pdf ) ( doc ).Sample 2: Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind.South Carolina School for the Deaf and the Blind (SCSDB) Sign Language Communication Philosophy, Policy, and Procedures for Student Teacher and Intern Applicants ( pdf ).South Carolina School for the Deaf and the Blind (SCSDB) Sign Language Communication Philosophy and Policy: Procedures for Implementation ( pdf ) ( doc ).South Carolina School for the Deaf and the Blind (SCSDB) Sign Language Communication Philosophy and Policy ( pdf ) ( doc ).Sample 1: South Carolina School for the Deaf and the Blind.Community Policy and Procedures Model Document ( pdf ) ( doc ).Model Research Study for Establishing Sign Language Skill Level Expectation for University Students Majoring in Education of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students ( pdf ) ( doc ). ![]() Model Sign Language Proficiency Interview (SLPI) Information for University Students Majoring in Education of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students ( pdf ) ( doc ).Model Sign Language Policy and Procedures for Student Teacher Applicants ( pdf ) ( doc ).In the Evaluators’ Resources part of this website, Training Workshop Materials Sections 1, 5, 7 and 8 provide additional information about the SLPI Rating Scale, what the SLPI:ASL assesses, and SLPI:ASL use and Section 10 provides information on connecting sign language instruction and SLPI:ASL results.įor more information about ASL training and evaluation at RIT/NTID, please visit the ASLTE website. In application, a primary use of the SLPI:ASL has been to assess how well people are able to use sign language for communication, and, as appropriate, to use this information to assist people in development of their sign language communication skills. The basis for ratings is the SLPI:ASL Rating Scale, a standard scale based on the sign language communication skills of highly skilled, knowledgeable native/native-like signers. SLPI:ASL interviews are recorded and subsequently rated independently by SLPI:ASL raters. For example, it is used in Kenya as SLPI:KSL, in South Africa as SLPI:SASL, and in New Zealand as SLPI:NZSL. Just as the L/OPI may be used to assess a variety of spoken languages the SLPI:ASL may be used to assess a variety of sign languages. The SLPI:ASL was adapted by Bill Newell and Frank Caccamise from the Language/Oral Proficiency Interview (L/OPI), an interview technique for assessing spoken language communication skills. Interview content varies according to the background, job responsibilities, schooling, and other interests of each SLPI:ASL candidate/interviewee. The Sign Language Proficiency Interview (SLPI:ASL) involves a one-to-one conversation in sign language between an interviewer and candidate/interviewee. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |